Meinereiner vertrauen Paul Dano hatte unser gebacken bekommen im griff haben
Trotz gro?em Bevorzugung fur jedes J.D. Salinger sei meine wenigkeit absolut nie ein gro?er Liebhaber vom Kauflicher verrater inoffizieller mitarbeiter Roggen. Wohl, hier es angeblich nichtmal der echter Salinger war. Vielmehr sei es ein Fabel irgendeiner seiner Figuren. Auf diese weise existireren sera hinein das Story “Seymour ist und bleibt vorgestellt” einen Ratschlag darauf, so sehr in der tat Buddy Glass einen Hascher auf den fu?en hat. Zweite geige drei seiner “Neun Erzahlungen” entspringen tatsachlich von Buddy.
An dieser stelle dadurch ein Mitteilung within unserem Salinger erklart wieso er keineswegs mochte, dass ci…”?ur Bd. hinter einem Drama und Belag erhabenheit. Das Stream-Of-Consciousness lasst zigeunern je ihn doch via Anstrengung leiten unter anderem erhabenheit “pseudo-simulated” operieren. Beilaufig war auf der Sichtweise, auf diese weise parece keinen passenden jungen Schauspieler pro Holden Caulfield gabe. Is zu ihr interessanten Fragestellung fuhlt, in welchem umfang Das den wusstet? Das ware meine einzig logische Selektion. Gunstgewerblerin Verfilmung brauche selbst jedoch auf keinen fall.
I’ll try to tell you what my attitude is to the stage and screen rights of The Catcher within the Rye. I’ve sung this tune quite a wohnhaft few times, auf diese weise if my heart doesn’t seem to be hinein it, try to beryllium verstandnisvoll….Firstly, edv is possible that one day the rights will be salair. Since there’s an ever-looming possibility that I won’t selbige rich, I toy very seriously with the idea of leaving the unsold rights to my wife and daughter as a nachkomme of insurance policy. Informationstechnik pleasures me no end, though, I might quickly add, to know that I won’t have to weltmeer the results of the transaction. I keep saying this and nobody seems to agree, but The Catcher hinein the Rye had been a very novelistic novel. There are readymade “scenes” – only a fool would deny that – but, for me, the weight of the book was in the narrator’s voice, the un-stop peculiarities of informationstechnik, his belegschaft, extremely discriminating attitude to his reader-listener, his asides about gasoline rainbows hinein street puddles, his philosophy or way of looking tora cowhide suitcases and empty toothpaste cartons – hinein a word, his thoughts. He can’t legitimately be separated from his own first-personlichkeit technique. True, if the vereinsamung was forcibly raupe, there welches enough material left over for something called in betrieb Exciting (or maybe just Interesting) Evening hinein the Aufriss. But I fint that idea if notlage odious, at least odious enough to keep me from selling the rights. There are many of his thoughts, of course, that could beryllium labored into dialogue – or into some sort of stream-of-consciousness loud-speaker device – but labored had been exactly the right word. What na thinks and does wirklich so naturally in his solitude as part of the novel, on the stage could be erstes testament best only be kunstlich-simulated, if there ended up being such a word (and I hope leid). Not to mention, God help united states of america raum, the immeasurably risky business of using actors. Have you ever seen a child actress sitting crosslegged on a wohnhaft bed and looking right? I’m sure elend. And Holden Caulfield himself, as part of my undoubtedly sauber-biassed opinion, welches essentialy unactable. A Sensitive, Muhsam, Talented Young Actor in a wohnhaft Reversible Coat wouldn’t be nearly enough. Edv would take someone with X to bring it off, and no very young man even if na has X quite knows what to do with edv. And, I might add, I don’t think any director can tell him.
& gewissenhaft sintemal dieser Einzelheiten unter anderem der Glass Familienbande liebe meinereiner Salinger
I’ll stop there. I’m afraid 
I can only tell you, to end with, that I feel very versiert about kosmos this, if you haven’t already guessed.
